{"id":4634,"date":"2024-03-14T18:17:02","date_gmt":"2024-03-14T18:17:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lifewaterreport.com\/?p=4634"},"modified":"2024-03-14T18:17:02","modified_gmt":"2024-03-14T18:17:02","slug":"fluorides-impact-on-neurodevelopment-health","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lifewaterreport.com\/fluorides-impact-on-neurodevelopment-health\/","title":{"rendered":"Water Fluoridation: Fluoride’s Impact on Neurodevelopment Health"},"content":{"rendered":"

Scientific research has revealed concerning evidence regarding fluoride’s neurotoxic effects, particularly on children’s developing brains. Studies have indicated that fluoride exposure can lead\u00a0ent against water fluoridation informed consent. By treating fluoride as a medication, public water systems are obligated to provide individuals with comprehensive information regarding its risks and benefits.<\/p>\n

This approach ensures that individuals can make autonomous health decisions, free from influence or undue influence.<\/p>\n

\"Addressing<\/p>\n

Addressing Regulatory Oversight<\/strong><\/h3>\n

In addition to the legal implications, the case against water fluoridation underscores the need for enhanced regulatory oversight and accountability. Despite persistent claims of safety and efficacy, fluoride additives in public water supplies have not undergone rigorous evaluation or obtained medical product licenses. Moreover, the source of fluoride, often derived from air pollution scrubbers, raises concerns about the presence of additional neurotoxins and heavy metals in treated water. Reevaluation of regulatory standards is imperative to safeguard public health and ensure drinking water system integrity.<\/p>\n

Charting a Path Forward<\/strong><\/h3>\n

By prioritizing scientific evidence and individual autonomy, we can strive to ensure public health interventions align with safety, transparency, and accountability.<\/p>\n

As we LOOK into the critical subject of water fluoridation, it becomes essential to explore the potential risks associated with the fluoride added to the public water supply in the United States. Community water fluoridation is widely recognized as an effective strategy for preventing dental caries, recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO).<\/p>\n

\"Health<\/p>\n

Health Effects of Fluorides<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Fluoride, which is added to the water supply of over 73 percent of the U.S. population, is not naturally occurring. Rather, it is derived as a chemical byproduct of the phosphate fertilizer and aluminum production industries, presenting an inherent risk.<\/p>\n

Fluoride affects the bones, teeth, skeletal muscles, and the nervous system. Fluoride poisoning symptoms are salivation, nausea, diarrhea, and abdominal pain (Chouhan and Flora, 2010).<\/p>\n

Contamination by Arsenic<\/strong><\/h3>\n

John F. Mueller Jr., a retired civil and control systems engineer, stumbled upon a disconcerting discovery during his review of a large municipal water utility’s fluorosilicic acid (FSA) purchasing contract.<\/p>\n

His analysis revealed consistent arsenic contamination in FSA shipments over several years, with levels ranging from 25 to 50 milligrams per liter (mg\/L).<\/p>\n

This revelation raised alarming concerns about the safety of the public water supply and the potential health risks posed by arsenic.<\/p>\n

\"Certified<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Certified\u00a0Chemicals for Water Fluoridation<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Fluoride exposure sources in the United States have increased since the 1940s. By 1960, fluoridation of drinking water had spread to over 50 million people in communities throughout the United States<\/p>\n

The National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) has certified three chemicals for water fluoridation:<\/p>\n